Skip to main content

A culture of respecting silliness


I realise that many of you think it's wrong of me to publicly ridicule religion but i'd just like to clarify the situation. It doesn't make me feel good to shame others and i don't think i'm better than anyone just because i have the capacity for basic reasoning.

It's not even that i'm opposed to the silly belief in a sky daddy with fairy helpers that live in cloud wonderland. As i've said many times before; you can honestly believe whatever you like, i also believe in silly things ("believe" is not quite the right word but i'll stick with it for this example) and i understand why other people think that my beliefs might be silly and might judge me for them, but importantly i understand that i might be wrong about these things and because of that i don't want to flaunt my silly beliefs until they have been thoroughly tested and substantially corroborated.

The problem is that there is a culture of respect for silliness, and fear was the initial motivator for that culture. People were once tortured and killed for "blasphemy". Thankfully we live in the information age and scepticism is now generally championed. All but the most abhorrent religions (I'm looking at Islam) have stopped the despicable practice of punishing blasphemers. But now we need to make it clear that beliefs and ideas are no longer afforded human rights. We must, out of intellectual duty, challenge and ridicule ideas and we must remember that ridiculing ideas is not a direct insult to the person or people who harbour such ideas. It's a challenge for them to strengthen, refine and substantiate those ideas.

The most important part of this process is to resist the urge to devolve into ad hominem arguments. We are attacking ideas, not people or their capacity to reason. The more you challenge people's beliefs the more motivation they have to improve their intelligence through logical reasoning. With a culture of scepticism; ideas improve, intelligence improves, myths are discarded and the world ultimately becomes a better place for everyone. Only silly beliefs suffer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quake3 in HD

Dust off the old PK3 files: Although it's over 10 years old, Quake 3 is still being played in offices around the world. Since id software has open sourced the Quake 3 engine; a community of developers has created an updated engine called ioquake3 and has recently also included a high resolution texture pack . ioquake3 is 100% compatable with Quake3 v1.32 so you will be able to join servers running the original Quake3 engine and vice versa. All you will need are the original pk3 files found in your Quake 3 baseq3 folder.

A Profound Understanding of Technology

The rate of technological growth is very predictable and is exponential. To draw a correlation; the Mayan calendar is understood to be a measure of significant technological events with an exponential decrease in interval time. This almost immediately disproves the man-in-the-sky idea of god because once we have successfully reverse engineered the human body we will be able to make vast performance improvements. The predictability of technology also simultaneously proves that there is some kind of divine plan at work. The machines will eventually take over but we won't be separate from them, we will become self-engineered, bio-mechanical, super intelligent beings. The singularity is upon us :D

Oracle Doesn’t Get Open Source

Oracle claimed that the EU didn’t get open source when they tried to prevent Oracle’s acquisition of Sun . It’s plain to see that the acquisition was purely to destroy the competition. Sun is dead and it’s software is slowly being buried with it. Well, not quite; Sun actively developed three of the worlds most important open source contributions; Java , MySQL and OpenOffice.org . Regardless of the loopholes that Oracle is trying to pursue with their current case against Google , once a copyleft license is applied, the product effectively becomes the property of the consumer. When the deal was announced, the open source community was up in arms however i believed that Oracle was simply waking up to the necessity for open source in the software industry. The world is not ready to drop the proprietary model just yet but a software company the size of Oracle must have realised that they were falling behind. I was wrong, Oracle have no clue about open source and apparently have no int...