Skip to main content

Microsoft Linux

By Andrew
As i've mentioned before; Microsoft has quite an impressive patent portfolio but instead of being a safeguard against devious copycats, those patents contribute to an aggressive anti-competitive strategy. I am aware of three agreements that have recently been entered into regarding Linux and it's "infringements" on Microsoft's intellectual property. Firstly; after a couple of sessions in the courtroom TomTom gave into to pressure and signed an agreement with Microsoft and effectively paid them to use Linux on it's devices. Amazon runs Linux on it's Kindles and agreed to pay Microsoft for it before any lawyers got involved. HTC has also agreed to pay royalties to Microsoft for the use of Google Android on some of it's phones.

It's a win/win situation for Microsoft because the companies that are willing to use Linux instead of Windows will be forced to pay Microsoft anyway. It seems Google has woken up the the fact that Linux is slowly becoming a Microsoft product. Although the Nexus One is built by HTC it is effectively a Google product and Microsoft would therefore have to approach Google directly. I could be wrong about this but i'll bet that Google would outright refuse to pay Microsoft for something that is open source and i don't think Microsoft is strong enough to take on Google. If Google doesn't have to pay then HTC doesn't have to pay and Amazon and TomTom don't have to pay either.

Microsoft has built it's fortunes on shady strategies such as this, we have to accept that this is how things currently work in big business but that doesn't mean that this is how things should be. Patents once served to protect the vulnerable inventor but are now used as monopolistic weapons. In the global society we live in today, where ideas and information is shared and built upon, patents no longer serve a purpose and are actually stunting technological growth. Companies like Microsoft and Apple certainly got the ball rolling back in the 80's but they jealously hold on to their precious patents because they want to hold on the the perception that they are still the innovators in the information sector but that is just not the case any more.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quake3 in HD

By Andrew
Dust off the old PK3 files: Although it's over 10 years old, Quake 3 is still being played in offices around the world. Since id software has open sourced the Quake 3 engine; a community of developers has created an updated engine called ioquake3 and has recently also included a high resolution texture pack . ioquake3 is 100% compatable with Quake3 v1.32 so you will be able to join servers running the original Quake3 engine and vice versa. All you will need are the original pk3 files found in your Quake 3 baseq3 folder.
6 comments
Read the full article »

A Profound Understanding of Technology

By Andrew
The rate of technological growth is very predictable and is exponential. To draw a correlation; the Mayan calendar is understood to be a measure of significant technological events with an exponential decrease in interval time. This almost immediately disproves the man-in-the-sky idea of god because once we have successfully reverse engineered the human body we will be able to make vast performance improvements. The predictability of technology also simultaneously proves that there is some kind of divine plan at work. The machines will eventually take over but we won't be separate from them, we will become self-engineered, bio-mechanical, super intelligent beings. The singularity is upon us :D
3 comments
Read the full article »

Oracle Doesn’t Get Open Source

By Andrew
Oracle claimed that the EU didn’t get open source when they tried to prevent Oracle’s acquisition of Sun . It’s plain to see that the acquisition was purely to destroy the competition. Sun is dead and it’s software is slowly being buried with it. Well, not quite; Sun actively developed three of the worlds most important open source contributions; Java , MySQL and OpenOffice.org . Regardless of the loopholes that Oracle is trying to pursue with their current case against Google , once a copyleft license is applied, the product effectively becomes the property of the consumer. When the deal was announced, the open source community was up in arms however i believed that Oracle was simply waking up to the necessity for open source in the software industry. The world is not ready to drop the proprietary model just yet but a software company the size of Oracle must have realised that they were falling behind. I was wrong, Oracle have no clue about open source and apparently have no int...
Post a Comment
Read the full article »